Compare Current and Target Processes on the Same Terms
As Is describes the current process; To Be describes the intended future process. Compare the same users, tasks, and conditions so the gap has a clear meaning.
Naming a new tool is insufficient as a target. Describe the change in work, such as eliminating duplicate entry or reducing the time a request waits for approval.
Record Work and Waiting Time
For an approval process, map receipt, checks, approval, and notification. Ten minutes of active work can coexist with a two-day approval queue; changing the entry screen alone will leave that delay intact.
Combine staff accounts with records and observation. GOV.UK discovery examines user problems and constraints before development. (GOV.UK: Discovery)
Define the Target and Its Constraints
For faster notifications, define the interval precisely: request receipt to notification dispatch. Decide whether out-of-hours requests count and record the relevant timestamps.
Set a target from current measurements and available staffing. An option that removes approval also needs an assessment of control responsibilities and operating constraints.
Test One Change and Measure the Gap
Standardizing required fields addresses a different cause from adding approvers. Pilot one request type, comparing returned requests and waiting time to examine benefits and side effects.
For an external announcement, publish the changed process, relevant service, and launch date. Keep internal request records and personal information out of public pages.
For a closer look at defining the problem, see problem framing.
SpreadSite is a no-code website builder that lets you create, publish, and update a website from Google Sheets using ready-made templates.
To publish a website explaining improvements to your service, give SpreadSite a try!
Build a website with SpreadSite →