Who This Article Is For
- People expecting major gains simply from adopting AI or RPA
- People busy every day without corresponding results
- People whose improvement efforts miss underlying problems
- Leaders reviewing work design before automation
Before Automation, Ask Whether the Work Is Needed
Learn why automating unnecessary tasks can preserve waste, how to identify work to remove, and how small trials can precede useful AI or RPA adoption.
Published
Review Whether Work Is Needed Before Automating It
Improvement aims to reduce unnecessary work and protect time for valuable work.
AI and robotic process automation, or RPA, can help. Automating needless work can also hide waste and add maintenance costs. Ask whether the task needs to exist before making it faster.
Why Automation Alone Can Disappoint
Faster processing, less manual labor, and fewer mistakes have value when the underlying work is useful.
Consider:
- Automatically producing reports nobody uses
- Summarizing meetings with no clear purpose
- Automating copying that could be eliminated
These accelerate waste. Automation can also make an activity seem justified and harder to stop.
Consider Elimination First
Identify what can disappear alongside what can become faster. A needless activity remains needless after efficiency improvements.
Without that review, you may find:
- More tools without relief for staff
- New work managing automated processes
- Too little time for important responsibilities
- Continuing busyness with limited results
Review Work Through Subtraction
Routine activities worth questioning include:
- Weekly material hardly anyone reads
- Recurring meetings continued only by habit
- Reentering identical information in multiple places
- Approval checks unused in decisions
Small activities can add up to a substantial burden.
Three Ways to Identify Removable Work
Ask About Value
Who benefits? Does it serve customers, decisions, revenue, or quality? Is it only a convention? An inventory reveals activities whose purpose has become unclear.
Keep Asking Why
Why does the report, approval, weekly meeting, or duplicate entry exist? Repeated questions can reveal a method that has become detached from its original purpose.
Imagine It Disappearing Tomorrow
Who would have a concrete problem? No identifiable impact suggests it might stop. A limited impact may allow an alternative. Unclear reasons deserve further review.
Automate After Simplifying
Automation is powerful for work with a clear need, repeated occurrence, and explicit rules: routine aggregation, reminders, conditional entry, and standard administration.
Use it after reviewing and reducing the process.
See RPA mechanisms and suitable activities, including differences from AI and tasks that do not suit automation.
Why Busy Organizations Keep Waste
Urgent responses leave little review time. Familiar work feels necessary because it has always existed, someone once requested it, or it is retained just in case.
Set aside time to identify stopping candidates before adding another tool.
Test Small Reductions
Try a narrower change before full removal: make a weekly meeting fortnightly, reduce report frequency, remove one approval stage, or stop entering one field.
If no problem appears, the activity may be removable. If a problem does appear, it clarifies the genuinely necessary part.
SpreadSite is a no-code website builder that lets you create, publish, and update a website from Google Sheets using ready-made templates.
To simplify website publishing around information you already maintain in Google Sheets, give SpreadSite a try!
Build a website with SpreadSite →
Closing Thoughts
Consider reducing work with little purpose so valuable work gets attention.
Before using AI or RPA, ask whether the task is necessary, removable, combinable, or simpler than its present form. This order can change the quality of improvement.
Thank you for reading!
I develop and operate SpreadSite, a service for creating websites from spreadsheets. Please consider it for communicating services and business information with less effort. SpreadSite
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Can automation still improve efficiency?
A: Yes, for necessary work. Otherwise it may hide waste and increase upkeep.
Q: What if removing work feels risky?
A: Test a partial pause or lower frequency and observe the consequences.
Q: What if colleagues object?
A: Discuss time spent, actual users, and the expected consequences of stopping, rather than relying on impressions.
Q: Could reducing tasks remove my own value?
A: Removing low-value work creates room for more useful responsibilities. Focus on the quality of the remaining contribution.
