Who This Article Is For
- Owners concerned about a culture dominated by precedent
- Managers reconsidering seniority-based evaluation
- Entrepreneurs exploring ways to develop a new business
Reconsider Old Organizational Habits With Lessons From Oda Nobunaga
Explore Oda Nobunaga’s example through a management lens, focusing on inherited privileges, purposeful systems, clear delegation, and credible evaluation.
Published
Decide What to Keep and Change by Purpose and Results Rather Than Precedent Alone
A management lesson drawn from Oda Nobunaga is questioning old arrangements and replacing them with systems that support results. Through this lens, his approach highlights reconsidering established privileges, selecting people, and clarifying responsibilities.
He judged longstanding practices by whether they served a purpose. That attitude offers a useful question for organizations weighed down by precedent.
Owners need to decide what to retain and what to change. Copying a dramatic reform alone cannot make that judgment.
What Can Be Learned From Nobunaga?
Historical policies and appointments cannot be transferred directly to a modern company. They can nevertheless provide perspectives for moving an organization forward.
Examples include:
- Reviewing established privileges
- Delegating according to ability
- Incorporating new systems promptly
- Removing customs that no longer serve a purpose
These four concerns remain relevant. Organizations accumulate tasks and arrangements that continue without a clear reason. Nobunaga's example provides a starting point for examining them.
Why Established Organizations Resist Change
An organization may be structured so that leaving things unchanged is easier. Asking for greater determination alone will not change that structure. Precedent, status, and custom can combine to discourage new action.
Common barriers include:
- Longstanding procedures take priority
- Nobody accepts responsibility for reviewing them
- Position determines judgment
- Seniority matters more than contribution
New proposals struggle under these conditions. Nobunaga's policies attract attention partly because they challenged fixed arrangements.
Changes to commerce can be interpreted as changing the conditions for market participation. Changes in appointments can be read as emphasizing roles and results. An organizational perspective makes these historical examples useful beyond the story itself.
A Management Perspective Drawn From Nobunaga
Examine the criteria behind the actions rather than their forcefulness: what received priority and what was changed?
Review Established Privileges
Challenging existing privileges resembles reviewing arrangements that benefit only certain people or departments.
Companies can encounter:
- One department controlling information
- Only longstanding employees making decisions
- Systems continuing despite limited effectiveness
Leaving these arrangements untouched makes entry harder for new people and proposals.
Turn New Technology Into an Operating Method
Nobunaga's example emphasizes integrating new tools into a method, beyond acquiring them. Introducing a tool alone does not produce business results.
Clarify:
- Who will use it
- Which work will use it
- What will change
- How the practice will become established
Systems, AI, and improvement initiatives often add tools without changing operations. Plan the operating method too.
Judge by Purpose
Maintaining a familiar method can become an end in itself and make the organization cumbersome.
Compare:
| Item | Custom first | Purpose first |
|---|---|---|
| Decision criteria | Precedent | Results and necessity |
| Meetings | Hold them because they have continued | Hold them when needed |
| Systems | Keep them because they are old | Check fit with the current organization |
| Delegation | Seniority and position | Role and ability |
Purpose helps distinguish what to retain from what to change.
See Testing Whether Work Is Necessary by Stopping a Small Part. It explains suspending part of a task and judging its actual effect.
Perspectives for Personnel Evaluation
There is no need to idealize a historical figure. Attention to contribution and delegation can still offer questions for reviewing evaluation.
Roles and Contribution Alongside Background
The relevant perspective is looking at actual work beyond origin or status. Titles and tenure alone can hide capable people.
Ask:
- What responsibility did the person carry?
- How fully did they complete it?
- What did they contribute to the organization?
- What can be entrusted to them next?
Current roles and contributions deserve attention alongside past experience.
Make Delegation Criteria Clear
A merit-based label creates dissatisfaction if criteria remain vague. Explain why work is entrusted to someone.
Possible criteria include:
- Results visible in figures
- Judgment in the assigned area
- Effects on others
- Reliability for continued responsibility
Visible criteria make evaluation easier to accept.
Avoid Running Evaluation Through Personal Sympathy Alone
Relationships deserve consideration, but sympathy alone can leave effort unrewarded and weaken the atmosphere.
Useful practices include:
- Publish evaluation criteria
- Clarify expected roles
- Assess results and behavior
- Explain areas for improvement
Neither severity alone nor kindness alone makes a system function. People need an understandable process.
SpreadSite is a no-code website builder that lets you create, publish, and update a website from Google Sheets using ready-made templates.
To present your company’s current services clearly without a complicated publishing process, give SpreadSite a try!
Build a website with SpreadSite →
About the Author
Thank you for reading!
I develop and operate SpreadSite, a service for creating websites from spreadsheets.
It helps people with limited time and money communicate what makes their work appealing. Consider it if you need a website! SpreadSite
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Will reform create strong resistance?
A: Resistance is possible. Shared purpose and clear criteria help people understand why change is needed and support acceptance.
Q: Will merit-based evaluation harm the atmosphere?
A: Unclear criteria create dissatisfaction. Explain roles, expectations, and the assessment of results, and accept responsibility for that explanation.
Q: Which customs should be reviewed first?
A: Begin with longstanding practices that no longer support results, such as meetings, reports, approvals, or permanently assigned responsibilities.
Q: Why apply historical examples to management?
A: They provide perspectives on judgment rather than literal models to copy. Examining what was dismantled and built can help frame current problems.
