Who This Article Is For
- Owners encountering the limits of top-down management
- Managers seeking greater initiative from younger employees
- Business leaders learning about self-managing organizations
Understand Holacracy Through Roles, Authority, and Clear Operating Rules
Explore role-based decisions in holacracy, how they differ from hierarchy, and what to consider about rules, meetings, evaluation, and a gradual introduction.
Published
Clarify Responsibility and Authority for Each Role So Decisions Can Be Made Close to the Work
Holacracy emphasizes roles and rules alongside, and often instead of, conventional superior–subordinate relationships. It seeks clearly assigned responsibility and authority so decisions need not all accumulate with managers.
Multiple approval layers slow responses to rapid change. Simply increasing freedom, however, does not make an organization work. People need written clarity about who does what and what each role can decide.
The central aim is an organization less dependent on particular individuals. Removing titles alone misses the operating arrangements required.
What Is Holacracy?
Holacracy organizes work around roles rather than positions. Define the responsibilities currently needed instead of relying only on titles such as department head or section manager, and attach authority to those roles.
Characteristics include:
- Focusing on who handles what rather than who ranks higher
- Reducing time spent awaiting a supervisor's judgment
- Defining responsibility for each role
- Revising roles as the organization changes
Traditional authority often attaches to a person or position. Attaching it to a role aims to reduce dependence on individual personality or status.
Differences From a Traditional Organization
The main differences concern where decisions collect and how responsibility is assigned.
| Item | Traditional organization | Holacracy |
|---|---|---|
| Decision center | Senior position holder | Person holding the relevant role |
| Organizational view | Departments and hierarchy | A collection of roles |
| Responsibility | Often concentrated around individuals | Defined by role |
| Organizational change | Can become cumbersome | Revision is expected |
Traditional structures remain useful for stable operations, quality management, and strong oversight. In rapidly changing work requiring local judgment, repeated approvals can become a burden. Role-based thinking then offers an alternative.
Main Characteristics
The core concerns roles, authority, and the purpose of meetings. Understanding the mechanisms makes the overall idea clearer.
Roles Before Fixed Titles
One person may hold several roles, such as public communication, recruitment, and customer response, each defined separately.
This helps:
- Make responsibilities visible
- Review personnel allocation
- Reduce the influence of titles
Work previously hidden behind a job title becomes visible in role-sized units.
Attach Authority to Roles
Instead of concentrating decisions in managers, provide the authority required by each role.
For example:
- A communications role decides what to publish
- A recruitment role adjusts recruitment conditions
- A customer-response role decides an initial response
Define the scope of each decision to reduce repeated upward checks.
Separate Meeting Purposes
Mixing information sharing, problem solving, and changes in responsibility can scatter discussion.
Consider separate purposes:
- Advancing day-to-day work
- Reviewing roles and responsibilities
- Sharing necessary information
Separating purposes is useful for meeting quality too.
Questions Before Introduction
Consider whether the approach fits the company's circumstances to avoid confusion.
Avoid an Immediate Company-Wide Switch
A wholesale change can create a heavy burden, particularly in a company accustomed to position-based authority. Moving without shared understanding causes confusion.
Possible starting points include:
- A small team
- A new business unit
- Meeting practices alone
- Initial role definitions
Everything need not change together.
See Defining Work to Delegate and Introducing Delegated Authority for widening local decision-making in part of the work first. It explains progress checks that reduce anxiety for the person delegating.
Autonomy Needs Clear Rules
More freedom requires clear operating arrangements. Talking only about autonomy can obscure responsibility.
Define:
- Roles
- Authority boundaries
- Meeting processes
- Review procedures
Greater freedom places more importance on the quality of these rules.
Design Evaluation and Compensation
Position-based salaries can conflict with role-based operations. Evaluation and pay therefore need attention before introduction.
Consider:
- What is evaluated
- How multiple roles are treated
- How results and contributions are assessed
- How the arrangement connects with existing systems
Changing operations while leaving evaluation untouched can undermine acceptance.
SpreadSite is a no-code website builder that lets you create, publish, and update a website from Google Sheets using ready-made templates.
To make company information easier for your team to publish and update, give SpreadSite a try!
Build a website with SpreadSite →
About the Author
Thank you for reading!
I develop and operate SpreadSite, a service for creating websites from spreadsheets.
It helps people with limited time and money communicate what makes their work appealing. Consider it if you need a website! SpreadSite
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Do supervisors disappear completely?
A: Position-based hierarchy becomes less central, but organizational responsibility remains. Roles still need clear authority, and the organization still needs supporting responsibilities.
Q: Can smaller companies introduce it?
A: Yes. Starting with selected meeting practices or role definitions is often easier than a complete change. Test and adjust gradually.
Q: Does it suit younger employees?
A: Visible roles and clear decision boundaries can help. Rules and responsibility must be explicit; freedom alone can create confusion.
Q: Is it better than a traditional organization?
A: Not universally. Traditional structures can fit stable operations and oversight. Holacracy is especially worth considering where adaptability and local judgment matter.
