Who This Article Is For
- Owners uncertain about price and contract negotiations
- Sales leaders protecting profit without yielding to pressure
- Professionals applying game theory to practical decisions
Set Concession Terms and Walk-Away Limits With the Chicken Game
Use the chicken-game model to assess breakdown costs, alternatives, and long-term interests, then choose when to stand firm, exchange terms, or walk away.
Published
Compare Breakdown Costs and Alternatives Before Setting Your Limits
The key judgment is where to concede and where to hold firm. Review conditions and interests before trying to overpower the other party.
The chicken-game model helps examine both potential gains and the danger of breakdown. A successful negotiation selects the most beneficial workable outcome for your business.
What the Chicken Game Describes
The model describes a situation where neither side yielding causes major loss, while one side yielding avoids collision. Price demands, deadlines, contract changes, and partnership terms can follow this pattern.
| Your response | Their response | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Firm | Concede | Your share is larger |
| Concede | Firm | Their share is larger |
| Concede | Concede | Agreement allows the transaction to proceed |
| Firm | Firm | Breakdown creates losses for both |
If the other side concedes, standing firm looks attractive. But when both follow that reasoning, the negotiation can collapse. The structure itself contains a source of conflict alongside emotions.
Habits of Effective Negotiators
Choose between firmness and concession by examining circumstances, your own profit and loss, and the cost of breakdown.
Three habits matter:
- Read the other party’s potential loss, beyond their stated position
- Judge by the final benefit, beyond an immediate win
- Set concessions through conditions and numbers rather than emotion
A clear boundary between acceptable and unacceptable terms provides a stronger basis than forceful delivery.
Three Factors for Setting a Walk-Away Point
Prepare decision information before the meeting.
Cost of Breakdown
Include lost sales, inventory, utilization, missed opportunities, internal effort, and effects on the next project.
For example:
- Another customer can replace this project
- Losing the project would disrupt this period’s plan
- Losing the contract would delay recovery of equipment investment
The party facing greater breakdown costs may feel more pressure to yield. Compare both sides’ costs.
Available Alternatives
Another supplier, customer, or partner reduces dependence on unreasonable terms.
Alternatives help you:
- Reject excessive discount demands
- Resist unrealistic deadlines or specifications
- Remain steady under bargaining pressure
Without another route, a firm opening position may still end in concession. Preparation begins before the meeting.
See building a BATNA as a negotiation criterion for developing candidates into alternatives you can actually use.
Effects on Long-Term Interests
A concession can become a precedent affecting future prices and contracts.
Ask:
- Could this concession become a permanent condition?
- Could other companies request the same treatment?
- Could it weaken the brand or your position?
Consider next year’s negotiating strength alongside this month’s figures.
When Firmness Helps and When It Becomes Risky
A firm stance can protect interests or create avoidable breakdown, depending on the situation.
When the Other Party Depends on You
Few alternatives, high switching costs, or a close deadline can make concessions more likely.
Examples include:
- A component maker with distinctive technology
- A specialist with few local substitutes
- A vendor deeply integrated with existing systems
Such advantages can justify maintaining terms instead of selling too cheaply.
When the Other Party Also Refuses to Yield
Mutual firmness can cause contract failure, delay, and relationship damage.
Warning signs include:
- Refusing movement on the basis of internal approval
- Repeated competitor comparisons used as pressure
- Deadlines demanding an immediate decision
Clarify the terms you must protect and offer concessions as exchanges, instead of simply escalating pressure.
When Emotion Takes Over
Reacting to tone or thinking that yielding means defeat can shift attention from interests to pride.
Useful responses include:
- Put the conditions on paper and narrow the issues
- Reconsider timing and scope alongside price
- Take the proposal away rather than deciding immediately
Treat the discussion as an arrangement of interests. Emotional escalation can damage the result.
Practical Ways to Protect the Walk-Away Point
A decision to leave can protect interests. Assess it as part of selecting an outcome.
Define Exchanges in Advance
Set boundaries for price, delivery, contract duration, order volume, and payment terms.
For example:
- Exchange a discount for a longer contract
- Limit specifications for an earlier deadline
- Require repeat orders for a lower initial price
Prepare exchanges of terms so movement has a corresponding benefit.
Ask for Specific Constraints
Statements about budget, internal approval, or cheaper competitors can mix real limits with bargaining.
Ask:
- What is the budget ceiling?
- When must the decision be made?
- What could be removed to secure internal approval?
Specific figures help reveal seriousness and actual limits.
Maintain the Agreed Boundary
An unclear boundary allows terms to deteriorate and creates poor internal precedents.
Maintaining it helps:
- Protect margins
- Keep internal judgments consistent
- Reduce vulnerability in later negotiations
A firm boundary may appear strict initially while supporting trust and sustainable profit over time.
SpreadSite is a no-code website builder that lets you create, publish, and update a website from Google Sheets using ready-made templates.
To explain your services and terms before negotiations through a website you can update easily, give SpreadSite a try!
Build a website with SpreadSite →
About the Author
Thank you for reading!
I develop and operate SpreadSite, a service for creating websites from spreadsheets.
It helps people with limited time and money communicate what makes their work appealing. Consider it if you need a website! SpreadSite
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Does the chicken game help in real negotiations?
A: Yes. Price, deadlines, and contract conditions often involve losses if neither side yields. Compare breakdown costs and your own limit to reduce emotionally driven decisions.
Q: Is a strong stance always better?
A: No. It gains more if the other side yields but risks breakdown if they do not. Decide where to press and where to move.
Q: Does conceding mean losing?
A: No. An exchanged concession that improves the overall agreement can be sensible. Movement without a corresponding benefit is the concern.
Q: What if the other side is always forceful?
A: Develop alternatives first. Then explain what you require in exchange for any concession.
Q: How can I avoid misjudging when to leave?
A: Set numerical limits in advance for margin, minimum price, deadline, and contract conditions. Preparation makes the decision less dependent on pressure in the room.
